Wachter on patient safety musts

There are some practices that 'clinicians should not have the right of individual veto'
By Bernie Monegain
10:23 AM

As much as patients have benefited from a healthcare system that has avoided blaming individual care providers for errors, Robert Wachter MD, proffers that the approach must also include accountability.

He writes in a new blog post in the journal Health Affairs that there are some practices in medicine that are a must-do, not merely a nice-to-do.

"We believe that the time has come to articulate criteria for 'must do' safety practices: practices that have sufficiently compelling supportive evidence that clinicians should not have the right of individual veto," he writes.

[See also: 12 patient safety gurus and why they matter. and Q&A: Robert Wachter on health IT's 'hope, hype and harm.]

Wachter puts forth a list of those practices. At the top are hand-washing and flu vaccines.

Here are Wachter's five criteria for putting certain patient care habits on the must-do list:

  • The patient safety problem that is being addressed is important.
  • The practice has been demonstrated by research or expert consensus to be effective in reducing harm.
  • The impact of compliance with the practice is substantial, i.e., a significant number of patient harms would be prevented.
  • Universal compliance with the practice, and auditing such compliance, is feasible for clinicians, health care organizations, and accreditors.
  • The practice has been accepted as a standard by the National Quality Forum, relevant specialty societies, and by broad professional consensus.

Read the blog here.

Want to get more stories like this one? Get daily news updates from Healthcare IT News.
Your subscription has been saved.
Something went wrong. Please try again.